Income Tax

These documents are available in Adobe Acrobat PDF format. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print it. If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your computer, you may download the software for free.

For judicial review action of which we have been made aware, all attempts have been made to ensure the correctness of information relating to judicial review of decisions of the State Tax Appeal Board. All critical information should be independently verified.

• Harlen Rice vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1997-2, 6/25/97) (PDF, 14kb)
• Jeffrey C. & Kelly O. Stone vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1997-1, 9/9/97) (PDF, 14kb)
• Ronald L. And Laureen H. Mashek vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: It-1997-5, 1/12/98) (PDF, 20kb)
• James and Annette Loflin vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1998-3, 9/27/99 (PDF, 30kb)
• Donald LaVerne Steinman vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1999-1, 02/25/00 (PDF, 12kb)
• Earl and M.J. Leibel Jensen vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1998-1, 7/31/00) (PDF, 49kb)
• Virgil And Louise Bates And Ruby Mountain Trust vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1998-2, 9/29/98) (PDF, 55kb) (Taxpayers' filed an appeal with the Eighteenth Judicial District in Gallatin County, under cause number CDV-99-30, on January 15, 1999. In its order dated June 9, 1999, the district court affirmed this Board's decision).
• Jan and Linda Struckman vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-1997-4, 9/18/00) (PDF, 20kb)
• Robert J. Thuesen vs. Department. of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2000-2, 6/26/01) (PDF, 42kb)
• Sean M. Patten vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2000-3, 10/29/01) (PDF, 28kb)
• Charles E.Wolfe/Mountain Pack, Inc., vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2000-4, 12/6/01) (PDF, 24kb)
• W. Craig Heymann vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2001-4, 4/29/02) (PDF, 44kb)
• Kynan Spethman vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2001-3, 8/19/02) (PDF, 33kb)
• Jay R. and Twila Daniels vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2003-2, 7/10/03) (PDF 33kb)
• Patricia Janes vs. Department of Revenue, (Docket No.: IT-2001-2, 1/29/04) (PDF, 107kb)
• Sean Patten vs. Department of Revenue, (Docket No.: IT-2003-4, 04/23/04) (PDF, 21kb) The taxpayer filed an appeal of the decision of the State Tax Appeal Board on June 23, 2004 in the Eighteenth Judicial District, Gallatin County. A hearing on the Petition for Judicial Review was held on February 9, 2005. During that hearing, the parties agreed to mediate. The district court reserved ruling, pending mediation. The court was informed that mediation was successful and that the parties were to equally share the cost of the mediator.)
• Mary Anne Simpson vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2003-5, 06/10/04) (PDF, 21kb)
• Ronald J. and Constance K. Stroh v. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2005-1, 01/05/06) (PDF, 42kb) The taxpayers filed an appeal of the decision of the State Tax Appeal Board on March 31, 2006 in the Seventh Judicial District, Dawson County. An order of dismissal was filed on 9/11/06 because the parties reached a mutually agreeable settlement.)
• Scott Steinfeldt vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2006-2, 08/13/07) (PDF, 88kb)
• Todd and Trina Wilson vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2007-2, 09/13/07) (PDF, 535kb)
• Diane M. Reiter vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2007-3, 10/16/07) (PDF, 68kb)
• Emily A. Bischoff vs. Department of Revenue (Docket No.: IT-2007-5, 03/21/08) (PDF, 53kb)
• Dennis and Linda Menholt v. Department of Revenue (Docket No. IT-2007-6, 04/23/08) (PDF, 47kb) The taxpayers filed an appeal of the decision of the State Tax Appeal Board on May 22, 2008 in the Thirteenth Judicial District, Yellowstone County.)